Hi Colin, Thanks for replying Can you elaborate a little on your response? I am not sure I quite got the context of the response. Are you stating that not having an array at the root would prevent that data from being injected into another JSON structure? What makes it not possible to do what you described if there was an object at the root?
Alex On Oct 18, 10:59 am, Colin Alworth <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, your JSON is expected to have an object, not a collection, at its root. > This turns out to be a good idea in general as well - in some browsers it is > possible to load json that starts in an array from another site, and read > the contents of those objects, something which is not possible if you start > with an object instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
