Thank you all for your clarifications! So there are *no particular reasons for not using a static EventBus* but I agree with Jens that using a static EventBus, hides the fact that a particular View requires an EvenBus. So I'll use the instance version of the EventBus instead of its static version.
On Monday, November 7, 2011 2:36:32 PM UTC+1, objectuser wrote: > > Not that it's really what you asked (I agree with the replies you've > received), but if you're using the idiom shown in some of the Google > presentations/samples/vids, instead of direct references to the EventBus > instance (which is a class and not an interface ... I don't know why), Indeed, EventBus is an abstract class. I suppose GWT devs haven't used an interfaces because EventBus implementes some functionality in two of its methods. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/tsmBZkTZkGEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
