You're correct. Best practice for choice of return type in an RPC interface is the exact opposite from what you would normally use in Java. That is, you should be as specific as possible to avoid forcing GWT having to generate serialization code for every implementation of Set or List etc.
Paul On 08/12/11 12:50, Filippo De Luca wrote:
Hi to all, I have a doubt about the best return type of a RPC service: shortly is better to return an interface or the implementation object? (Set or HashSet?) I think is better use the implementing class due to the fast serialization or permutation, am I wrong? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/SbFWi-Eelc8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
