Thx again, your hint simplified my code a lot!
On Monday, March 26, 2012 4:22:27 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 4:18:19 PM UTC+2, Alexander Orlov wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, March 26, 2012 1:49:59 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>>
>>> The private field storing the LeafValueEditor's values is only
>>> initialized in edit(), so in your case you have to call edit() again from
>>> your onSuccess.
>>>
>>
>> Thx, for the clarification in respect to *isDirty(). *In fact isDirty()
>> become clean after I've called edit() again. But my *actual problem was
>> that the modifications I've made were also not been persisted*. I've
>> found a way to persist them doing something like
>>
>> final *EmployeeReqCtx* reqCtxDriver = *(EmployeeReqCtx) *
>> cf.getDriver().flush();
>> reqCtxDriver.*put(employee)*.​fire(new Receiver<Void>() {
>> // persists the edited *employee** *
>> }
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> final RequestContext reqCtxDriver = cf.getDriver().flush();
>> reqCtxDriver.fire(new Receiver<Void>() {
>> // ... doesn't work at all for editing entities(?) although it's
>> mentioned in the Editor example
>> }
>>
>>
> It's works very well... provided you previously queued a call to your
> put() method in the RequestContext !
> The example does this just before calling edit() on the EditorDriver.
>
>
>> *in save()*. Although I can't imagine that one needs explicit casting to
>> edit an entity..., it works.
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/YRhJfe5WNG0J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
