OK I'm pretty convinced now, I will give RF a try ! Le dimanche 8 avril 2012 16:16:14 UTC+2, Thomas Broyer a écrit : > > I'd recommend request factory. The issues with rpc are: > * rpc strongly couples your client and server, so you face invocation > exceptions every time you deploy a server side change. RF on the other hand > is a protocol, not an RPC API. > * generator bakes every subclass of your objects on the client. That > means you have to be very careful with what types you use / are in the > classpath when you compile. With RF you only have what you want, you're in > complete control. > * batch requests are baked into the RF protocol, you don't have emulate > them with "dto containers". Plus you can easily change your mind at any > time, and also possibly batch things from independent components (loose > coupling ftw) > > Sure RF has a steeper learning curve but I believe you win in the long > term. > I'd suggest you upgrade to 2.5 as soon as its released though: many fixes > to RF are coming. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/6-ybzy3gXnUJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
