I don't want to make a big fuss about it, I just thought it was odd that GWT would restrict something that is valid and I thought was common.
On Monday, April 23, 2012 8:49:08 PM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Monday, April 23, 2012 10:43:50 PM UTC+2, Patrick Tucker wrote: >> >> Well that stinks. Seems like a warning would suffice, allowing those >> that did it on purpose to be able to do it and those who did it on accident >> to fix it. >> Is there somethinng that can be done to allow us to do this? Maybe >> another class that is both a SafeHtml and SafeUri that can be used in both >> places? >> > > Well, I suppose we can bring the discussion to GWT-Contributors and see if > John is OK to change it to a warning in retrospect. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/aDoTlIneEjAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
