On Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:31:17 AM UTC+2, Brandon Donnelson wrote:
>
> How about put a try catch around the list.flush() for tracking down the
> offending null list.
>
> ListEditor.class {
> //...
> public void flush() {
> list.flush(); // <<<< try catch this for easier debugging
> }
> //...
> }
>
> Thoughts?
>
What would the "catch" block do?
Wouldn't the correct fix rather be: if (list != null) { list.flush(); }
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/j72sBQj23r8J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
