+1 for CSS 3 transitions. Should be easy to implement and browsers that do not support transitions simply switch instant between slides. Small downside: You kick out animations in IE9 (it supports canvas but not transitions).
Transition browser support: http://caniuse.com/#search=transition Transition overview: http://css3.bradshawenterprises.com/ A fallback solution for IE could be GWT's Animation class where you could implement your transition "by hand". GWT Animation examples: http://fascynacja.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/gwt-animation-small-review/ http://www.giantflyingsaucer.com/blog/?p=1548 As already mentioned the main advantage of using transitions/GWT animations is that your slides can be HTML and thus can contain clickable links, or even animations inside a slide. -- J. Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012 06:29:00 UTC+2 schrieb regnoult axel: > > Hello, > > I am trying to develop my own slideshow reader (you just see the albums > fotos in the full screen mode and slide them). > I started using HTML5 canvas but just because it was more "modern" but IE8 > does not support HTML5 canvas. So my question is : "Should I use HTML5 > canvas to do my slideshow (I will need a caroussel and animation between > images) ?" Could you argue your answer (because maybe HTML5 canvas are more > interesting to do more complicated things) ? > > Thanks you, > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/CY4RZHEbrCAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
