Thank for the reply. I'm only marshalling/unmarshalling on the server-side
- so does that mean I should move those classes into a "server" package?
That's even if the annotation is in the shared bean? Yes, still using
GWT-RPC. Is the workaround as simple as this?
My.gwt.xml (before)
<module>
<source path="common"/></module> <module> <source path="common">
<exclude name="MyXmlAdapter1.java" />
<exclude name="MyXmlAdapter1.java" />
</source>
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, Andrea Boscolo wrote:
>
> Such annotations are not GWT compatible (i.e., they are not known to the
> GWT emulated JRE and definitely cannot be compiled in js, even providing
> the relative sources - that I think they can be found in jaxb-api-src.jar
> inside the jaxb distribution).
> To allow jaxb annotations (and annotations only) to be used in
> client/shared side, you have to tell the gwt compiler to compile those
> classes ignoring such annotations while still allow the server side to use
> them.
> See http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4020#c8for
> the workaround.
>
> If you are using an XmlAdapter (the class) in client code, move it to
> server side (i.e., keep your marshalling/unmmarshalling logic in the
> server).
>
> I assumed you are using GWT-RPC of course. With RequestFactory you should
> have no problem at all.
>
> On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:33:54 PM UTC+2, shawnjohnson wrote:
>>
>> I am having this issue as well. The annotations are in models in our
>> 'shared' package - shared between client and server. Anyone know what I
>> should change to resolve this?
>>
>> On Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:38:27 PM UTC-5, Andrea Boscolo wrote:
>>>
>>> I suppose you are trying to use that annotation on a client side
>>> class; javax is not emulated by gwt compiler, so you couldn't use it
>>> client side.
>>>
>>> Why not moving the adapter to the server side? Does your client really
>>> need it?
>>> Annotated jaxb classes can be used by the client (with a couple of
>>> tweaks and not for all annotations), but marshalling/unmarshalling to/
>>> from xml, still need to be handled server side. In this point of view,
>>> the adapter can be known only to your server.
>>>
>>> I can tell you the tweak, but first try to move it server side.
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/eC1QWJAsKmAJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
