umm no.

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Chris Lercher <[email protected]>wrote:

> About Dart:
>
> - I really (!) hope that Dart will succeed.
> - Ideally, Dart would even become the new JavaScript alternative in all
> browsers (however, AFAIK a few browser vendors have signaled, that this
> ain't gonna happen). If not, then it could maybe still be successful with
> dart2js.
>
> About GWT:
>
> - GWT allows to code in *Java* for the client side, which is perfect, if
> you already use *Java* on the server side.
> - There is no significant amount of existing Dart code for the server
> side, so Dart does not have that advantage.
>
> Conclusion:
>
> "GWT + Dart" would be such an awesome combination: GWT compiling Java to
> Dart. And then Dart to JS only if necessary.
>
> - This would require changing GWT internals,
>
> - but it wouldn't require changing the GWT API and programming techniques
> much (except for low level JSNI and JSO) - remember, that a lot of the GWT
> API is about manipulating the DOM (which stays the same no matter if the
> underlying language is JS or Dart), handling browser events, ...
>
> - As long as you want to work with Java on the server side, it's a good
> idea to use GWT - otherwise you'd have to duplicate common parts of your
> code for the server (Java) and client side (Dart) - like in the medieval
> days before GWT. (I hope we'll never have to fall back to that situation.)
>
> Alternative:
>
> The alternative would be that Dart also succeeds on the server side,
> completely replacing Java. This is rather unlikely, but if things like O/R
> mapping, fully-fledged IDEs, and anything of value that Java provides is
> available in Dart someday, plus if it provides any real advantage over
> Java, then I'm the first one to switch completely to Dart. Then we wouldn't
> need GWT anymore, and Dart would probably adopt all useful GWT features.
> (And it should be straightforward to port existing GWT code to Dart.)
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:57:42 PM UTC+2, deepak chauhan wrote:
>>
>> One question is disturbing me from a long time. Why Google invented DART,
>> when GWT is already there?
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/G02R2U9lzkcJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to