Thomas,
Thank you, as always, for your thoughtful reply. I wonder how you get any
real work done with your dedication to this forum. I suspect you get a bit
less sleep than me.
The flush technique works fine. I even managed to craft a little editor
visitor that passes a flush command to editors that want it (those that
implement HasFlushCommand) so that they can request a driver flush (on a
value change) without knowing anything about the driver. With that, I can
have generic UiBinder-compatible validating editors that are capable of
displaying immediate errors, like:
<e:ValueBoxEditorDecorator ui:field="priorityEditor" >
<e:valuebox>
<v:ValidatingIntegerBox ui:field="priorityValidator" /> <!-- so that
the app can set properties (min, max, immediate or whatever) -->
</e:valuebox>
</e:ValueBoxEditorDecorator>
I don't think it strays too much from the spirit of the editor framework.
Thanks again.
On Monday, October 8, 2012 9:33:33 AM UTC-5, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 8, 2012 3:56:57 PM UTC+2, RickL wrote:
>>
>> There is a workaround, but it is not very elegant. You can do a
>> driver.flush() in a change handler for the field you want to validate
>> on-the-fly which, of course, re-validates (i.e. calls getValue()) on all
>> fields. That seems to me a bit like swatting a fly with a sledgehammer.
>>
>> It would seem better to have, perhaps, another recordError method
>> signature like:
>>
>> void recordError(String message, Object value, Object userData, boolean
>> immediate);
>>
>> When immediate is true, the driver would immediately post the error to
>> the nearest super-Editor that implements the HasEditorErrors interface,
>> rather than waiting for a driver flush().
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
> Don't try to abuse the Editor framework for use-cases it's not meant to
> fulfill. What you actually want is some widget that validate the field "as
> soon as possible" and displays the error if any, *and* integrate with the
> Editor framework so that any detected error will also be reported to the
> EditorDelegate.
> Either that or flush() at each change.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/LiYLAskwY7MJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.