Probably not since it isn't a regression. At this point most changes will
be after 2.5. (Figuring out a clean test case will help for making that
happen.)
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:35:33 PM UTC-7, Paul Wagland wrote:
>
> Great news! This results is massive code reductions for us! Especially
> with the closure compiler. Wow!
>
> The only problem I see so far, is that my issue is still not addressed.
> For some reason when compiling I am getting two types that seem to have
> different Oracles, but the same name.
>
> Changing line 275 of
> dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/typemodel/JAbstractMethod.java
> as follows
>
> - if (candidate.getType() != paramTypes[i]) {
> + if (!candidate.getType().toString().equals(paramTypes[i].toString())) {
>
>
> fixes my problem. Is there any chance that this fix could be included in
> 2.5 final?
>
> The issue is here:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6420&q=JAbstractMethod&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars
>
> The simple example as given in that issue does not reproduce the problem,
> and I have not been able to reduce the problem down to the simplest case.
>
> If it can't be fixed, I will live with it, since I already know the
> modifications that I need to make to get it to work with my product, but I
> would really like to be able to use GWT "out of the box".
>
> Thanks in advance for your considerations.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/qHaSWfhdjSwJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
