On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:14:51 PM UTC+2, Joseph Lust wrote: > > Chris, > > Indeed, it is old. It still works however, and GWT Coverage is more > important to me than moving to v2.1. When getting my whole team to use it, > this is easier than asking folks to explode/repackage the jars as the > official GWT fix requires. I've looked at the patch on the Google site, but > the code it patches/namespaces are now totally different. On asking the > Emma team to merge the old fix, hoping they'd have the expertise, they > responded with "wont-fix". So, if anyone is bored, and familiar with > Jacoco, I'll trade you a beer for a patch. :) >
Just stumbled on http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.jboss.errai%7Cjacoco-gwt-maven-plugin%7C0.5.4.201202141554%7Cmaven-plugin No idea how it works, etc. though -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/wOIBxJJHPGIJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
