Thanks guys! I think I will call edit() on a new instance, as this is a nice way of doing it.
Also, are there significant benefits to re-using an editor? Mine is declared as final at the top of my view, then in edit() I am calling driver.initialize() and then driver.edit(object). That means I'm re-using it, right? Drew On Friday, 2 November 2012 09:32:07 UTC, Jens wrote: > > Just searched a bit and I think the post in question was > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/aemVcEjK_5I/7VISroJi2VcJ > > But if its seems to be solved since GWT 2.3 it should be fine to reuse the > editor driver. > > -- J. > > > Am Freitag, 2. November 2012 03:30:36 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Broyer: >> >> >> On Thursday, November 1, 2012 7:45:30 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote: >>> >>> >>>> +1 except you don't have to create a new editor driver, you can reuse a >>>> previously built one. >>>> >>> >>> Wasn't there a memory leak somewhere in the editor framework when you >>> reuse the driver? That was somewhere in my head while answering. But maybe >>> its already solved. >>> >> >> I'm not aware of anything like this (which doesn't mean there's no such >> issue, but it hasn't been reported) >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/NfPExhrs6dMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
