On Monday, November 5, 2012 6:56:29 AM UTC-8, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 5, 2012 3:41:26 PM UTC+1, Ryan Shillington wrote: >> >> To be a little more blunt than Christian - I would like to see some >> results from the Steering committee. I don't care about timelines as much >> as I care about direction. What direction are you taking GWT for vNext? > > > The only thing that's certain for now is moving to Maven as the build > system and modularization (split gwt-dev, gwt-user and gwt-servlet into > smaller modules and no longer duplicate things between produced artifacts; > the gwt-dev/gwt-user/gwt-servlet JARs will still be produced for those > people downloading the SDK as a ZIP bundle). >
For the Google GWT team I can say that we plan to work on making Super Dev Mode better and on speeding up the GWT compiler. Making it easier for GWT to accept open source contributions is also a priority. As always, we work on high-priority bugs for Google teams, whatever they may be. Beyond that, planning is tentative. Other GWT contributors can speak for themselves. The direction that GWT takes depends on what people volunteer to spend time on and whether they can get consensus that it's a good idea; for example, good Maven support would not be happening if it weren't Thomas Broyer's priority. - Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/KJMD9JxVMsMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
