Results will be published on Tue. Sorry for it taking this long. > Id be interested too. > > GWT is so interesting, as a small team it has let us do so much so > much easier. > Its hard to say where to draw the line in regards to features and what > is "core" > > Id like too see WebGL support at some point - possibly via a canvas- > esq widget. But how to do this in a lightweight yet expendable way I > have no idea. > > On Oct 26, 8:20 pm, "t.dave" <[email protected]> wrote: >> have the results of this survey been posted anywhere? if not, any ETA on >> when they might be? >> >> much thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:23:24 AM UTC-7, Joonas Lehtinen wrote: >> >>> What is your opinion on the future of GWT? >>> How should GWT develop? >>> What technologies should it better support? >>> ... >> >>> We all would like to get answers to these questions, right? To do so, we >>> created survey with help of Ray Cromwell, Artur Signell, Mike Brock, David >>> Chandler, Daniel Kurka and Bhaskar Janakiraman. >> >>> If you want to help finding the best direction for GWT, please fill the >>> survey at:http://bit.ly/GWT2012 >>> (it will take just 10 minutes) >> >>> When the results are collected, the will share the information with you. >> >>> - Joonas @ Vaadin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
