On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:23:48 PM UTC+1, Magno Machado wrote:
>
> I've achieved a great code reduction by avoiding gwt widget stuff when 
> compiling as a js library. Basicaly I'm working directly with Element and 
> DOM classes. Each permutation is now ~10kb (Before it was ~20kb)
>
> I'll experiment tuning my module's <inherits>
>
> Currently it just inherits User.gwt.xml, which in turn inherits lots of 
> modules that I don't need, like:
> Tree, RichText, History, Animation, etc.
> While the compiler do a good job removing unused code, I'm wondering 
> wether those (and other) modules may still leave some "footprints"
>

Unless they add linkers (depending on what they do) or entry points, no. 
AFAICT, only com.google.gwt.logging.Logging could have an overhead even if 
not actually used.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/lcScc2-FAccJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to