On 02/10/2013 10:16 AM, Alp Yilancioglu wrote: > > > FYI, Wave doesn't rely on the browser's XML support. Given Google > is obsessed with performance, that makes me wonder if > com.google.gwt.xml.* is the best choice. Admittedly, Wave never > supported IE; but my point is: you'd better benchmark. Did you > know that some browsers (Chrome IIRC) are actually faster at > building things with a "detached DOM" than string concatenations > and innerHTML? > > +1 > Either that or send JSON; or actually anything but XML (IIRC, Wave > only sends the initial document as XML, everything else is > actually JSON-based, from protocol buffers definitions)ifyou > > > > the data is not mine, i am getting the data from external servers, > and it comes in the XML format, thats the thing. > JSON is better for me too but it is Xml, if you can show me a way on > this i would be glad
Then use your server as a proxy to the external data source. Your client calls your server which sends a request to the external servers for the data set. Those machines return the XML to your server which generates either HTML or JSON. That data set is then returned to your client. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
