Hi, When you run IE8 in quirksmode GWT still reports that you are using ie6 and as such overriding of ClippedImageImplIE6 still makes a difference. (Assuming that your site is running in quirksmode and you use the Image class). Otherwise you can indeed ignore this.
25% that is really terrible! I started at 10% and got down to 0% after fiddling. I did not change the css directly, there is a method on the Window classes available that allows you to remove the shadow. But ok, why not :-) Do you have some animated gifs in your application ? David On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Borys Zibrov <[email protected]>wrote: > Thank you! > We do not use IE6, so there was no point in overriding > ClippedImageImplIE6. I switched off the shadows via overriding css file > used by GXT Layer component appearance and memory went down like hundred > megs or so (which is good, but not as good as can be), but the CPU usage is > still constant and around 25% and everything renders not very fast at all : > ( > > вторник, 14 мая 2013 г., 16:17:55 UTC+3 пользователь stuckagain написал: >> >> Hi, >> >> IE8 consumes a lot of memory, especially in combination with GXT. >> >> GXT relies on opacity which is know to consume a lot of memory in IE8. >> GWT uses of DXTransform to enable alpha blending for PNGs. In fact it >> will even constantly consume CPU power when you use the Image class. >> If you don't need IE6 support you could disable that trick. I know it >> made a big difference in my application. >> >> If you write lots of recursive code then IE8 is also consuming a >> ridiculous amount of memory. IE9 is a lot better, except that that one is >> leaking in RPC due to a bug in JS eval, specifically to IE9 only. >> >> David >> >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Borys Zibrov <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yeah, I now it is faster, I just wish there was something I could do >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:39:51 PM UTC+3, Jens wrote: >>>> >>>> IE8 is just a different beast than IE9. As IE9 is a lot faster than IE8 >>>> I would guess they changed a lot internally and these changes also account >>>> for the memory difference you are seeing. IE9 is just more efficient than >>>> IE8. >>>> >>>> I think you cant really change anything about it but I would be happy >>>> if you can prove me wrong :-) >>>> >>>> -- J. >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to google-web-toolkit+**[email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to google-we...@**googlegroups.com. >>> >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>> group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en> >>> **. >>> For more options, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> >>> . >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
