Hi, The following is the memory graph from JVisualVM of the GWT compiler when compiling my modules.
<https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-108riwJnhYo/Uc1T1fmyn9I/AAAAAAAAAC8/DisMhsEbbg8/s1436/GWTCompilerMemory1.png> I was trying to understand the memory consumption at different stages of the compiler using the VM argument - -Dgwt.memory.usage. The following is the JVisualVM graph and the console output when the compiler is run with the same. <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-dV8t7dsIhrE/Uc1RVq0MXuI/AAAAAAAAACs/Rxby6Jt6ME0/s1435/GWTCompilerMemory.png> Will print mem usage Compiling module XXX [CompStateBuilt] 320804120 heap, 21314504 nonheap, 342118624 total, 23.21s [AstOnly] 604512808 heap, 42120632 nonheap, 646633440 total, 38.71s Compiling 6 permutations Compiling permutation 0... [makeSoycArtifactsS] 754570192 heap, 50642360 nonheap, 805212552 total, 103.22s Compiling permutation 1... [makeSoycArtifactsS] 737860952 heap, 51196480 nonheap, 789057432 total, 55.79s Compiling permutation 2... [makeSoycArtifactsS] 737125848 heap, 51479208 nonheap, 788605056 total, 56.86s Compiling permutation 3... [makeSoycArtifactsS] 736970808 heap, 51584272 nonheap, 788555080 total, 57.11s Compiling permutation 4... [makeSoycArtifactsS] 737455120 heap, 51679488 nonheap, 789134608 total, 55.08s Compiling permutation 5... [makeSoycArtifactsS] 737228448 heap, 51688424 nonheap, 788916872 total, 54.64s Compile of permutations succeeded Linking into xxxxxxx Link succeeded Compilation succeeded -- 498.726s As you can see, the graph is different when run with the -Dgwt.memory.usage option. When this argument is specified, at the end of each permutation System.gc() gets called 4 times by com.google.gwt.dev.util.Memory.maybeDumpMemory() and then prints the memory statistics in the console[makeSoycArtifactsS] . Because of these garbage collection calls, the heap size gets reduced to around 750 MB. Basically during each permutation compile, the memory goes up while building the permutation and goes to a low while printing the output. Now, if you see the first graph, which is obtained without this option, the heap size does not come down after each permutation compile, so the overall memory required goes up for the last 2/3 permutations(There is a difference of ~450MB) . I also looked at what is causing the memory to jump during each permutation compilation by taking a heap dump at one of the peaks and comparing it to the heapdump at the AstOnly stage. The comparison showed that most of the memory is taken up by HashMap.Entry objects which contain JMethod,JField etc.. Most of these HashMaps are referenced by * com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.ControlFlowAnalyzer.RescueVisitor* . I have the following questions - Should GWT be calling System.gc() by default after each permutation compile so that the heap does not grow? (Right now it does that only with the -Dgwt.memory.usage option) - The memory growth due to RescueVisitor, can this be due to including modules which are not required? Is there a way to find out the classes that are pruned by the compiler. Can there be any other optimization we can do to reduce this memory growth? Right now there are only 20 modules in my application, that number is going to grow significantly going ahead and that's the reason we are doing this analysis to understand what can be done to reduce this memory growth. Thanks, Ranjith -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
