Did wonder about that. Another big dependency though? Looking at the jGrowl code I mostly want the CSS. Most of the JavaScript is just for setting configuration options, GWT/Java is nicer for that than JSON like config (IMHO).
On Monday, February 17, 2014 11:31:45 AM UTC, Alain wrote: > > I m guessing GWT Query could help do the port ? > Note I never used GWT Query. > > > 2014-02-17 12:17 GMT+01:00 salk31 <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > >> I really like https://github.com/stanlemon/jGrowl but this would be our >> only reason to include jQuery so I'm reluctant to bring in such a big >> dependency. >> >> Anyone got a nice pure GWT version? >> >> I can't find any mentions since: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/google-web-toolkit/toaster/google-web-toolkit/uK_cgGqn2U4/0xdsLW7Ry1YJ >> >> If not I'd be up for asking the jGrowl guy for permission to do a GWT >> port, would anyone be interested in using/sharing/helping? >> >> btw I'm after more than NotificationMole (although I've not even managed >> to get that to work yet). jGrowl has nice CSS and easy options for timing, >> stacking, position etc >> >> Regards >> >> Sam >> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
