Yeah, that would be useful. I'm kind of curious about the part: "I'd like to see something a bit more advanced where you don't need to declare the @UiFields". I may be misinterpreting that, since I don't see how you could use the Java class without the fields. Or you just talking about assuming the presence of the annotation, since the Java field names have to match the ui:field attributes in the xml anyway?
On Monday, June 2, 2014 12:21:33 PM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Monday, June 2, 2014 3:32:41 PM UTC+2, Steve C wrote: >> >> It would be nice if the UiFactory methods could somehow be separated out >> into their own class for reuse, but I don't think that's possible. >> > > Cf. the discussion in > https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6151 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
