On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 3:08:11 PM UTC+2, Vic wrote:
>
> Wow, Thomas, thanks for response. When I changed generator implementation
> to
>
>
> *String className = packageName + "." + simpleName;*
> if (printWriter != null) {
>
> ....
> className = composer.getCreatedClassName();
> }
> return className;
>
>
> it started to work as expected. Thank you very much. Sometimes GWT sticks
> me up by its unpredictable behavior.
>
"unpredictable" ?! GWT's behavior is in 99.9% of the cases very much
predictable, sometimes "unexpected", but predictable.
In this case, it's in the javadoc:
http://www.gwtproject.org/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/core/ext/Generator.html#generate(com.google.gwt.core.ext.TreeLogger,
com.google.gwt.core.ext.GeneratorContext, java.lang.String)
*Returns:*
the name of a subclass to substitute for the requested class, or return null
> to cause the requested type itself to be used
You returned null in some cases, and in those cases, GeneratedInterface
was used, as predicted.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
