+1, the version should be 0.1-incubating. Thanks guys!
Cheers, Chris On Jan 31, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > Hi, > > I believe the only restriction about versioning to include -incubation > suffix is when the code is released. But for consistency, it is a very good > idea to change the version to 0.1-incubating. > > And yes, since after the branch, we need to rename trunk version to > 0.2-incubating. > > Enis > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henry Saputra > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I saw in the build.xml and build-common.xml the version value is 0.1. >> Should this be 0.1-incubating instead? >> >> Once 0.1-incubating is released, should this be changed to >> 0.2-incubating in the trunk? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Henry >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
