Hi Chris,

Yeah I would like us to pick the low hanging fruits before end of
week. If anything, it will at least appear that we've taken the
valuable IPMC opinions into consideration.

Are we happy with changing, the core Gora project description to
"open-source software for mapping objects to NoSQL databases", as this
was Marcel's suggestion before he voiced his +1. The only other
alternative that was voiced was to head over to board@... wdyt?
Another critical point here was the possible ambiguity of including
datastores for Apache Hadoop e.g. whether or not Gora relied upon
Hadoop. Can we clarify whether this should be made explicit as well.
In my opinion this is not a potential block but it would be grand to
get it ironed out.

If we also address Sebb's GORA-71 it would be good, I'm waiting on him
getting back to us via Jira, however if anyone else has their own
solutions then fire them up and I will begin work.

 Thanks

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
<chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> Great discuss thread, thanks for opening this conversation up.
> It would be nice to get Sebb's, Niclas, and Daniel's VOTE. I'll
> ping them to see what they would like to VOTE and then check perhaps at the
> end of this week/beginning of next week. At this point, we already have
> enough VOTEs to graduate, considering that Enis and Julien are members
> of the IPMC.
>
> I don't think it would hurt though to address the doc issues, maybe we can
> update it in the meanwhile before end of this week or beginning of next
> week?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 7:21 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I think so far things have been going OK regarding the above
>> conversation which Chris directed towards general@.
>>
>> Is there anything we could do to push this through e.g. make the
>> necessary steps as a community to convince Sebb, Niclas Hendhman,
>> Daniel Shahaf that we a worthy of getting thier VOTE?
>>
>> There was some consensus regarding a possible change in documentation
>> which will hopefully paint a more accurate descriptive picture of what
>> Gora actually is... can we formally agree if this is necessary, also I
>> think it would be great to address the recently created GORA-71 issue.
>> By the looks of it, this is a fundamental barrier to us getting Sebb's
>> VOTE.
>>
>> Can anyone else provide any suggestions at this stage?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Lewis
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>



-- 
Lewis

Reply via email to