On 2012-07-20, at 6:40 AM, David Bruant wrote:
> storing information in private mode (I'm less sure for this one) or tampering
> with the application or blocklist update systems. seems like things to be
> added to the list of "intentional things that shouldn't require a delay
> before blocking".
I don't think "storing information in private mode" is a black and white rule.
Failing to observe state sanely is an easy mistake to make. Deliberately
subverting private mode is another story, of course.
-- Mike
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance