On 2012-07-20, at 6:40 AM, David Bruant wrote:

> storing information in private mode (I'm less sure for this one) or tampering 
> with the application or blocklist update systems. seems like things to be 
> added to the list of "intentional things that shouldn't require a delay 
> before blocking".

I don't think "storing information in private mode" is a black and white rule.  
Failing to observe state sanely is an easy mistake to make.  Deliberately 
subverting private mode is another story, of course.

-- Mike
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to