On 15/05/13 16:56, Tim Chien wrote: > There is no different human rights in different contexts, for > different countries. If (by if I mean I don't know if Benjamin think > of that) government censorship (and/or prosecution on individual based > on her/his access of a censored website) is a violation of human > rights, it would always be a wrong thing to do.
Most governments make some attempt to censor child pornography on the Internet, and prosecute individuals who access it. If government censorship is (in all circumstances) a human rights violation, than all of these governments are violating human rights. Mozilla is not a human rights organization, it's an open internet organization. This is what we have come together and agree on. Therefore, I suggest that arguments for or against keeping this addon on AMO should be based on Mozilla's principles, not on anything else. > (Disclaimer: this email represents opinion of my own even through I > send it with an @mozilla.com e-mail address.) Don't worry, that's the default :-) Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
