Hi Ben, On 25/10/13 05:31, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > I'm writing today to put forward the following proposal for @mozilla.org > email addresses for Mozilla Reps as outlined here: > https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Mrz/mozilla-org
You specifically mention Mozilla Reps, but that document says: "To best reflect Mozilla's purpose as a non-profit mission first, paid-staff will also have @mozilla.org email addresses." Is that still part of the plan? I agree with Majken that if we are making people Reps who aren't capable of representing Mozilla, at least at the level of having an email address, then something has gone wrong. Can you explain more why you feel that an additional vetting step is needed? Also, not everyone can or wants to become a rep. Can you expand on why you feel we should tie this to the Reps program particularly? At the moment, a discussion is going on about how we can create a set of trusted people who can take part in Mozilla-internal discussions on topics that we don't yet want shared with the press. It seems like the problem of who gets @mozilla.org email addresses is a similar problem. Perhaps the two could be combined? We need to have a big effort to figure out how to define this group, and then give them both the email addresses and the internal forum access. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
