It doesn't help that we don't have a better method to discuss bugs. Discussion shouldn't happen on bugs, it should happen on the mailing list/newsgroup, but that requires signing up for the whole thing, not just discussion of the one bug (it'd be great if we had some sort of parallel system, like discussion pages on wikis, this is a known issue).
So, besides what has already been said, step 1 of appealing is to bring up your objections in the right forum, *not* in the bug. Appealing in the bug makes the bug less (or even not at all) useful for developers. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:13 AM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 09/01/2014 14:51, Kyle Huey a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> How can we call a vote? How can we appeal? >>> >>> Mozilla is not a democracy. There are no votes. If the relevant module >> owner does not wish to make a change the only person that can overrule >> them >> is Brendan Eich. >> > Indeed. > > There are ways to leverage support from module owners. For this sort of > concerns, alignment with what other browsers do could be an argument. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
