Safe Browsing has typically been considered its own toolkit
sub-module, and isn't a "content security policy" the same way CSP/MCB
are. I don't really have any objection to grouping it with the others
in a new module, though.

The "DOM" in your proposed Bugzilla component name seems misleading -
this stuff doesn't seem particularly DOM-related.

Are there other upcoming/proposed code areas/features that you would
see as also fitting under this module?

Gavin

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Garrett Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are several "content security policies" that live in DOM
> or toolkit, but the owners/peers of those modules are not the people who
> do the majority of the work writing or editing code for these
> components. I propose we create a new "Content Security" module to house
> these related features. The features in question are:
>
> * Content Security Policy (CSP)
> * Mixed Content Blocker
> * Safe Browsing
>
> Name: "Content Security"
> Description: Security-related content policies
> Location: dom/security
> Owners: Sid Stamm, Gian-Carlo Pascutto
> Peers: Garrett Robinson, Tanvi Vayas, Dan Veditz
> Bugzilla Component: Core::DOM: Security (needs to be created)
>
> Source dirs/files:
>
> * toolkit/components/url-classifier
> * content/base/+
> ** test/csp
> ** src/CSPUtils.jsm
> ** src/contentSecurityPolicy.js
> ** src/CSPService.cpp/h
> ** public/nsIContentSecurityPolicy.idl
> ** src/nsMixedContentBlocker.cpp/h
> ** test/{test,file}_mixed_content_*
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to