And now... more mincing of words. If you people think that mincing words is 
convincing anybody, think again.

Here is what was claimed; "Contrary to our competitors, Firefox is fully open 
source, if someone would like to insert this kind of "tracking", we would know 
and the reviewer won't allow it:"

But I guess that can be minced, too, just like Mitchell Baker's words after 
Eich was forced out (where she effectively apologized to gays for offending 
them and said not a word in support of Eich) are being minced. Then again, 
Baker deliberately used ambiguous language, which is a common tactic. That 
seems to be the 'culture' at Mozilla.

 

14.04.2014, 01:30, "Kyle Huey" <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Big Fred <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  You are mincing words, trying to evade the truth, as if there is some great 
>> difference between deliberately introducing a vulnerability that invades 
>> allows invasion of privacy and writing code that does it directly. Your 
>> central point that open source is always secure is completely wrong and you 
>> can't admit that.
>
> We're getting really far off topic here, but nobody seriously claims
> that open source is always secure, or that any software is always
> secure for that matter.  If you can point me to somewhere where
> someone from Mozilla said that open source is always secure I will be
> happy to try to have it corrected.
>
> - Kyle
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to