And now... more mincing of words. If you people think that mincing words is convincing anybody, think again.
Here is what was claimed; "Contrary to our competitors, Firefox is fully open source, if someone would like to insert this kind of "tracking", we would know and the reviewer won't allow it:" But I guess that can be minced, too, just like Mitchell Baker's words after Eich was forced out (where she effectively apologized to gays for offending them and said not a word in support of Eich) are being minced. Then again, Baker deliberately used ambiguous language, which is a common tactic. That seems to be the 'culture' at Mozilla. 14.04.2014, 01:30, "Kyle Huey" <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Big Fred <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are mincing words, trying to evade the truth, as if there is some great >> difference between deliberately introducing a vulnerability that invades >> allows invasion of privacy and writing code that does it directly. Your >> central point that open source is always secure is completely wrong and you >> can't admit that. > > We're getting really far off topic here, but nobody seriously claims > that open source is always secure, or that any software is always > secure for that matter. If you can point me to somewhere where > someone from Mozilla said that open source is always secure I will be > happy to try to have it corrected. > > - Kyle > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
