Hi saphirjd, On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:05 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://darrningram.wordpress.com/ > > I find that blog posts here really enlightening! Why is it necessary to > make such a compromise towards customization removals with Australis in > favor of Third party interests? > > And why you are forcing employees to go out in anonymity to speak about > things which are clearly wrong at Mozilla?? > We do not, and you can see that by looking at the last few weeks' posts on http://planet.mozilla.org, for example. In fact, I very much doubt that this person really works for Mozilla. (They actually never really state this: being a "Mozilla Developer" doesn't necessarily mean being an employee. The supposed inside knowledge and the danger of being fired very much makes it sound that way, though.) In fact, what reason do you have to believe that this person is working for Mozilla? Just that what they say is critical of Mozilla? That hardly seems like a good reason. Where's the inside knowledge in those posts? "Google influenced Australis" isn't inside knowledge: it's an unproven assertion. > > Why is it necessary you had to get rid of your CEO in favor of Third party > interests? > This is not what happened. You might be interested in this collection of questions and answers on the topic: https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/04/05/faq-on-ceo-resignation/ > > You have to understand the more you do not say the truth the more trust > you will lose. > > So.... I look forward for your answers and your immediately plans of > termination of Outside groups influences in Mozilla towards your UI plans, > about your opinion towards traditional marriage and free choice of opinion > for your employees without being treatened like Brendan Eich. > > Stop making such compromises which end in resulting of removal of > customization and termination of employee contracts! > > Stop developing for Third party interests and start developing again for > Firefox users who want to have a Mozilla with a fair treatment of different > opinions towards sex and marriage and who refuse to kill customization > because a third party organization tells them to do so! > Again: what reason do you have to believe that this is what happened? Australis has been developed in the open over the course of a few years, and all design decisions and the arguments for and against them can be seen in bugs discussing them or design drafts. Also, what on earth would Google gain by influencing what our UI looks like? If the answer is that they want us to be less competitive: why would we give in to their demands? Because we want to have fewer users? thanks, till _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
