> Jim schrieb: > >> You have still not proven your claim that the CDM will be robust
There's nothing to be gained from debating robustness here. Us convincing you about robustness is entirely beside the point. What matters is Adobe convincing streaming service operators that Adobe's solution meets the robustness rules imposed on each streaming service by the studios that supply the content. It's fair for you to be skeptical about the viability of Firefox's upcoming integration with Adobe Access when you haven't seen any streaming provider say they'd use it yet. Mozilla disclosing the integration makes it easier for Adobe to start convincing streaming providers. On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Robert Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that can only be proven once the code exists, and it still to be > written. Once it's there, I'm sure everyone will be happy if you inspect it > for that robustness. It seems that you are probably unfamiliar with the word "robustness" as a term-of-the-art in the DRM context. Robustness means the capacity of the DRM implementation to resist attempts by the end-user to examine or modify the state of the DRM black box. -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] https://hsivonen.fi/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
