If that *is* what Cameron is referring to, it illustrates my point perfectly of the Government continually conflating two completely different things.
Unless, of course, we've gone full doublespeak, and 'child abuse material' now means material which parents feel their might child find disturbing... and therefore constitute child abuse? I have no idea... *sigh* ~Leo On 15/12/14 14:04, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 11/12/14 13:58, Kate Black wrote: >> "Microsoft, Google and Mozilla were "working together to look at" having >> "built-in restrictions to block access" to child abuse material - Mr >> Cameron said this would be a "game changer"" >> http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30426164 > > I have been unable to find out for certain inside Mozilla what Mr > Cameron was referring to; some people think it might be Prefer:Safe, > which is where Firefox will respect the OS's content blocking settings > and send a header which should ideally discourage sites from sending > offensive content. > > https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2014/07/22/prefersafe-making-online-safety-simpler-in-firefox/ > > That blog post begins: > > "Mozilla believes users have the right to shape the Internet and their > own experiences on it. However, there are instances when people seek to > shape not only their own experiences, but also those of young users and > family members whose needs related to trust and safety may differ. ..." > > Gerv > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
