> > Religion, however, belongs to one of those "things that are only a > > matter of opinion". > > This opinion was precisely why I wrote my next sentence: > > >> The difficulty arises, of course, when it's not agreed whether > >> something is undecidable or not. > > That it, I don't agree with you that it's a thing which is only a matter > of opinion. > > >> I don't mind in the slightest if people tell me I'm wrong. I see it > >> as a chance to learn, and I see that attitude (as opposed to > >> running off in a bad mood) as the mature one. Would it be possible > >> for everyone to agree that expressions of disagreement are OK? > > > > Oh, really? The discussion above clearly states that religious > > affection on Planet Mozilla is wrong. Therefore, you are wrong when > > you post religious content on Planet Mozilla. Now, here's your chance > > to learn, once and for all. > > "Learn" != "automatically agree with the other person".
Ah, I get it. Learning for you equals "I only learn when something falls within my own opinion". In that case, of course, you do want to "learn" more about it. Everything else (including your religion; which for you is the greatest thing in the world and the conscious part of you does not get how it could be different for other people) does not even reach the conclusion that some things are just wrong. Religion *is* a matter of opinion. If it was not, it would not be called "religious belief" but "religious fact" or something like that. _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
