On 13/04/15 05:46, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > We are talking about radical participation this year as a organization > priority but there are still a lot areas of the project and to Mozilla > itself that are not visible to core contributors (I like to call it the > Great Wall of Mozilla) even those who are under NDA. I was recently > discussing how there is a prevalence to flag groups of bugs and types of > bugs as company-confidential by default when they could be open to core > contributors who are in the NDA Group.
To add some data to the discussion, here are some numbers for groups in Bugzilla which aren't security groups (i.e. they don't conceal security bugs). All counts are total bugs, other than where indicated. Note that having a group in this list does not mean I think it should necessarily have its access permissions broadened. marketing-private: 381 metrics-private: 1,940 mozilla-confidential: 4049, of which 27 are open mozilla-employee-confidential: 10,000+, of which 1,973 are open, 10,000+ fixed (Bugzilla won't tell me how many; there's a 10,000 limit) mozilla-engagement: 889 mozilla-foundation-confidential: 17 mozilla-messaging-confidential: 0 mozilla-reps: 7301 pr-private: 0 privacy: 0 www-mozilla-org-confidential: 11 community-it: 22 consulting: 0 mozilla-confidential for many years early in the project was a catch-all group for things which needed to be hidden. For many years it was rarely used, but in mid-2013 it started to receive large dumps of obsolete bugs. It doesn't seem to be used much for live bugs, although the Data Compliance group seem to be using it. Automatic Memberships: mozilla-confidential automatically includes all Corporation, Foundation and Messaging employees, assuming they are members of the appropriate (non-bug) group. mozilla-employee-confidential automatically includes all Corporation, Foundation and Mozilla Japan employees. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
