(Pasted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172126. There are 
some comments on Hacker News at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9667809).

Mozilla's recent integration with Pocket, a proprietary third-party service, is 
a mistake.

It is very exciting to see the ways in which Firefox continues to improve. And 
it's even more exciting to see the ways that Mozilla advances it's stated 
mission outside of the Firefox browser with new developments like Firefox 
Accounts. Pocket now allows you to log in on their site using your Firefox 
Account; being able to authenticate with a trusted third party like Mozilla is 
a huge win for online privacy advocates and the Mozilla community. However, 
adding Pocket as a built-in feature to Firefox should not have been done.

This is particularly surprising since it was Firefox that made browser 
extensions mainstream. Pocket should have been an extension (in fact, a Pocket 
extension used to exist). It could have even been bundled with the browser. 
This distinction is important, since extensions can be removed entirely, 
whereas currently Pocket can only be disabled. 

The user experience of disabling Pocket is not good, either. It needs to be 
disabled in about:config, which is not at all user friendly, and therefore not 
in line with Mozilla's mission. In the past, Mozilla has been very good about 
showing the user what new features have been added to the interface and 
explaining any privacy implications that may come with them. That is why I was 
so surprised when the Pocket icon suddenly appeared in Firefox Developer 
Edition a couple days ago. It is so unlike Mozilla to introduce something like 
that, I ran a virus scan and checked what programs had been installed recently 
-- I assumed it had been put there in the same way that IE users used to get 
the Ask Toolbar installed. 

It may also not be clear to some users that, even when signing in with your 
Firefox account, you are still giving your email address to a third party whose 
privacy policy is different than Mozilla's. Many users would not assume this, 
since it is a feature that is bundled with the browser.

Mozilla's recent blog post about the Pocket feature is titled "Firefox Puts You 
in Control of Your Online Life" 
(https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/06/02/firefox-puts-you-in-control-of-your-online-life/).
 Had this been coming from a startup, that post would be humorously ironic. But 
given how much people care about Mozilla and it's stated mission, it is more 
painful than funny.

Firefox should continue to add new features that benefit its users, but those 
features must be done in accordance with Mozilla's core values. This feature 
should've been done as an extension, which allows for greater user choice and 
avoids bloat. Most importantly, there was very little public discussion about 
this inclusion of a proprietary, third-party service. It's a huge departure 
from Mozilla's commitment to transparency. The existence of the Pocket code in 
Firefox is a bug in the browser, and it does not adhere to Mozilla's core 
mission.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to