> Firefox should continue to add new features that benefit its users, but those 
> features must be done in accordance with Mozilla's core values. This feature 
> should've been done as an extension, which allows for greater user choice and 
> avoids bloat.
I assume some of the German people at Mozilla have already seen this, but I'd 
just like to leave these comments from a German IT-news article here:
http://www.heise.de/forum/iX/News-Kommentare/Mozilla-nimmt-Reader-Software-Pocket-in-Webbrowser-Firefox-auf/forum-198500/page-2/

Translating a few subject lines, for those who are interested:
- "Sowas von überflüssig.." - "Totally unnecessary.."
  (the comment is about how Pocket should be extension)
- "Proprietärer Cloud-Dreck!" - "Proprietary cloud-crap!"
  (the comment is about how Pocket is just another spy-/bloatware component 
that got added to Firefox, and how you need to disable it in about:config to 
make it stop 'phoning home')
- "Zum Abschalten: about:config -> browser.pocket.enabled = false" - "To turn 
this off: [...]"
  (subcomments include things like "Wozu wohl der String 
"browser.pocket.oAuthConsumerKey" dient? Ein Schelm..." ("I wonder what the 
browser.pocket.oAuthConsumerKey option is for? Evil to him who evil thinks..."))
- "Und er wird immer fetter ..." - "And it [the Firefox core] is getting more 
and more bloated..."
- "Bitte noch Thunderbird und Sunbird integriegen..." - "Now please go on by 
integrating Thunderbird and Sunbird..."
  (goes on about how we will end up at Netscape Naviagtor and/or a web suite, 
being the primary reason why Firefox exists and that we have to to choose 
between the devil (Chrome) and the deep blue sea (Firefox) these days)

Those are really sad to see. Unfortunately, they are getting more and more 
common these days.

> It may also not be clear to some users that, even when signing in with your 
> Firefox account, you are still giving your email address to a third party 
> whose privacy policy is different than Mozilla's.
In my opinion this is particularly bad. Why should anyone expect 
core-components to 'violate' your privacy by adhering to different rules (i.e. 
ones that you wouldn't expect, seeing as component X is part of the Firefox 
core)?

I hope somebody at Mozilla sees the need for a (few) change(s).
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to