So, my main question/concern  is that you're combining the server and the
client code. Can either of the Ryans review Gecko code? (They're smart
people I like, I just don't know if this makes sense.)

Is this two modules, or should there be an overall module to cover stuff
like protocol/API changes, but the code is in submodules?

On 9 July 2015 at 10:05, Gian-Carlo Pascutto <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> currently SafeBrowsing is wedged into the (DOM) Content Security module,
> even though the relevant code is unrelated and the relevant peers and
> owners can't review each others' code. We also have a "Tracking
> Protection" module, which is separate even though a lot of client side
> code is shared with SafeBrowsing and the server-side code is essentially
> a SafeBrowsing server. The module owner no longer works on it and the
> peers are two managers which AFAIK aren't reviewing anything.
>
> So, we'd like to pull SafeBrowsing out of Content Security and merge it
> with Tracking Protection into a new module, URL Classifier, and set the
> owners/peers to the people actually working on it.
>
> Name: URL Classifier
> Description: Database and list-based classification of URL resources,
> such as Tracking Protection and SafeBrowsing.
> Owner: Gian-Carlo Pascutto, Ryan Tilder
> Peer(s): Francois Marier, Ryan Kelly
> Source Dir(s):
> toolkit/components/url-classifier
> netwerk/base/src/nsChannelClassifier
> https://github.com/mozilla-services/shavar
> URL:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Phishing_Protection
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Roadmap/Tracking
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Features/Application_Reputation
> Discussion Group:       mozilla.dev.platform
>
> --
> GCP
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to