Hi,

I disagree, Reps Council has been a body with the authority to decide on
resources and deal with possible conflicts for communities since day
zero and Reps Council has an already recognized authority.

I don't understand what was not working well in your opinion and also I
don't agree on the part that Council doesn't have time for that. I've
been personally taking that responsibility for reviews from Council side
for years and never expressed a lack of time.

I raise this concern now because I've just received and email telling me
that Council is not longer in charge of certain decisions that I
understand that were not part of this module description when we first
read it.

Cheers.

El 17/06/16 a las 16:05, Majken Connor escribió:
> We actually proposed this module with guidance from other council
> members and with Pierros' blessing.
>
> The services provided by this module have never been provided through
> Reps. We only used Reps Council to verify the "authority" of the
> people making the requests to make the requests. That wasn't working
> well and Reps Council doesn't have time to maintain this responsibility.
>
> If you read the previous messages in this thread, you'll see that
> David and I did discuss accountability.
>
> This proposal has been accessible to you for a long time. If you reach
> out to us, we would be more than happy to explain the module and the
> program in more detail.
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Rubén Martín
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     Historically the Mozilla Reps Program has been in charge of most
>     decisions concerning local communities and volunteer resources (and we
>     still are).
>
>     I have a major flag here since it's unclear to me the authority this
>     module would have to decide on them. Authority and accountability that
>     currently the Reps Council has and it's widely recognized as a
>     governance body representing the core volunteers population.
>
>     To whom this module would be accountable to? Should it take decisions
>     without review from a body that represent the community? Why?
>
>     I will run this also with the Reps Council because just recently
>     learned
>     that certain decisions we are already accountable for will be
>     under this
>     module and I feel we don't agree with that.
>
>     Cheers.
>
>     El 16/02/16 a las 16:41, Majken Connor escribió:
>     > I have been working with Tom Farrow (tad) and some other
>     community members
>     > to put together a proposal for better delivering Web Services to
>     > Communities.This would restructure the delivery of services like
>     hosting,
>     > domains and emails which are currently provided to communities.
>     Creating a
>     > module would provide clear authority around these services, as
>     well as
>     > allowing communities to be equal stakeholders in what services are
>     > delivered, and how.
>     >
>     > The module also creates accountability on the part of
>     communities which
>     > will allow for better communication between resource owners and
>     the groups
>     > that provide them (eg Community Ops), faster problem solving (eg
>     downtime
>     > recovery), and impact (better supported sites are better quality
>     sites).
>     >
>     > This document is what we think is realistic plan for
>     implementing the
>     > module.
>     >
>     
> https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla-community.org/document/d/1zXuNp8dwyLOW-UqZ4FqcRVxhszHWYqgjClDKZ5kYrTQ/edit?usp=sharing
>     >
>     > This document is a our vision of what the module could become
>     once fully
>     > implemented:
>     >
>     
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YdNWOy7QNc1xXcnHGN5IW4HhRgRJCjOdKMu_gHFjUM4
>     >
>     > We are proposing that the module be called Mozilla Communities Web
>     > Services, that Tom Farrow be the module owner, and that myself
>     and Michael
>     > Kohler be peers. Suggestions for additional peers are welcome,
>     but the
>     > intention for now is to add people as they take on leadership roles.
>     >
>     > Questions and suggestions are of course welcomed.
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > governance mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
>
>     --
>     Rubén Martín [Nukeador]
>     Mozilla Reps Mentor
>     http://www.mozilla-hispano.org
>     http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano
>     http://facebook.com/mozillahispano
>
>
>


-- 
Rubén Martín [Nukeador]
Mozilla Reps Mentor
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org
http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano
http://facebook.com/mozillahispano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to