Jim, can you elaborate on what you mean by "Results data limited to numeric, text; Coded results will be needed for observables"?
On the "Vitals & other observables" slide, we show a coded result for "Walking", no? -- Dan ________________________________ From: Dan Connolly Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 8:40 PM To: Campbell, James R; [email protected] Subject: RE: PCORI Information Model draft_v1.2 It looks like the attachment might be too big for the mail archive service, so I put a copy in google docs for convenience: * PCORI Information Model_draft_1.2<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1smiU-oDS8X6ZX8bWrViiZcOqp7RyvjsmVvZd6kQAL8c/edit?usp=sharing> ________________________________ From: Greater Plains Collaborative Software Development [[email protected]] on behalf of Campbell, James R [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 10:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: PCORI Information Model draft_v1.2 Thanks to Nathan for pointing our that the star schema data model posted from the JAMIA paper does not align with the documentation in the current i2b2 release. I revised the draft slide set for discussion this week and aligned the 'out-of'-the-box' view with the documentation for release 1.7 on the i2b2 web site. Reading the documentation a bit further, I began to realize that our standardization discussion will need to include the i2b2 scheme load to assure the ontology versions align. Jim
