My two cents regarding the provider dimension - at least at Iowa, nobody seems 
to care about individual providers, but we have received numerous queries over 
at least the past two years that would
a.  restrict patients to those seen in particular clinics
b. restrict patients to ambulatory vs. in-patient
c.  identify patients admitted to an ICU vs. a non-ICU unit , or those who are 
moved within units (one of our clinician-researchers is interested in premature 
discharges of patients from ICUs to general units who are then readmitted to 
the ICU)

The way we intend to handle this is through a provider-dimension polyhierarchy 
that drills down to individual departments, and goes no further. (One practical 
issue here is that the CLARITY_DEP table in Epic in our institution is 
minimally curated - we have departments with "names" like 1, 2, 5, etc., or a 
nonstandard abbreviation that is meaningful only to those who use it daily.)

One of the issues regarding attempting to drill down to individual provider 
level is there may be multiple providers associated with a single visit, and 
Epic forces you to designate one person as the provider (e.g., the attending, 
even if the patient was seen by a resident). To some extent, this issue occurs 
with departments for hospitalizations as well- the department initially 
admitted to may not be the one where the patient spends most of her/his time.

Prakash

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Campbell, James R
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Gpc-dev] Agenda items for Tuesday 3/4/14


Hackathon minutes review

Review of standardization principles and project plan from Hackathon

Discussion of Visit dimension attributes

Discussion of provider dimension: licensure and role

Agenda discussion for Quality Assurance subcommittee and project planning

Discussion of Diagnosis modifiers for data attribution;

    team input on pathologic diagnoses, radiologic diagnoses and lab diagnoses

The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended 
only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure 
of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
please delete it and immediately contact the sender.


________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to