Yes,
I think I responded before: we probably have several good abstract ideas and 
possibly the two panel thoughts but the most interesting speculative one is 
around Jim McClay's topic.

Would just like to see a list of the proposed abstracts so we don't have people 
working at cross purposes,

Russ


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Campbell, James R
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:57 PM
To: Bonnie Westra; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Gpc-dev] Files for aftenoon discussion


Bonnie

AMIA only requires a one page abstract for a poster.  I agree that we are early 
in our efforts but would you be willing to pare down what you have done and 
focus on our development of standard data model on behalf of the GPC-DEV?  I 
will be happy to write with you

Jim

________________________________
From: Bonnie Westra [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:42 PM
To: Russ Waitman
Cc: Campbell, James R; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; McClay, James C
Subject: Re: Files for aftenoon discussion
Thanks for the follow up Russ.  It is definitely up to you as PI regarding what 
you think is important as well as when and how to share
Bonnie

Bonnie L. Westra, PhD, RN, FAAN, FACMI
Associate Professor, University of Minnesota,
School of Nursing & Institute for Health Informatics
Director, Center for Nursing Informatics
Location - WDH 6-155
P - 612-625-4470, Fax - 612-625-7091
email - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Mail - WDH 5-140, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455



On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Russ Waitman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jim and Bonnie,
I don't know that we should do a panel of the just the GPC.  The point of a 
panel would be to see the contrasting approaches of different CDRNs which is 
what will be nice about the panel at AMIA-CRI in April.

I also am not sure we will have enough baked to have a panel that brings clear 
results to the audience by November.

That said, I would see two options for a panel:


1.       Speculative similar to the data standards AMIA-CRI panel of what we 
think we will do.

2.       Results based on what we've done.

If #1, I would think the most informative speculative panel would be one with 
the other CDRNs discussing how we see us integrating RCTs and PROMs into the 
clinical workflow/EMR.  Jim McClay would be the panelist for the GPC.

If #2, I would think we could potentially do a GPC alone panel that has the 
results of how we had a couple key sites get their i2b2s to line up and also 
present things like Babel (though we'll present it in April so it's not new 
news) and give examples of mapping challenges, data quality etc.

-          I would think then we pick a couple places that come from different 
experiences.  Say Nebraska who's new to i2b2, as well as a couple places that 
have been doing it a while.

-          But, #2 would actually be more interesting if we had it with a 
couple other CDRNs.

Otherwise, I think we have a bunch of good poster topics for AMIA this year but 
not sure much is yet at the paper level.  Now if the deadline was in a couple 
months we might have a very good set of papers either on

-          the babel/standards alignment work with real results

-          presenting an early cohort characterization

-          doing follow up on the AMIA CRI abstract I submitted where we 
quantify and compare attribution of diagnoses across different sources at 
different sites.  I'd like to see us do that and would like to be senior author 
but am open to anyone highly motivated taking the lead as first author.

Russ







From: Campbell, James R [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 7:35 AM
To: Bonnie Westra; Russ Waitman
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Files for aftenoon discussion


Thanks for working on this Bonnie.  I am forwarding your draft to Russ since I 
think that the approach you have taken is more appropriate to originate from 
the network lead.

Russ, what do you think?  Can you provide some guidance as the PI?



I was thinking of a tighter focus for a panel on our standardization efforts 
involving the GPC-DEV participants who plan to be at AMIA and want to speak.  
The theme of that panel would relate more to pragmatic issues of aligning our 
existing EHR data models with that of the S&I framework from ONC.



I think that your draft raises the question of the number of submissions GPC 
should consider and what themes we wish to propose.  Russ, can you comment 
today?

Jim

________________________________
From: Bonnie Westra [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:37 AM
To: Campbell, James R
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Files for aftenoon discussion
One of my assignments was to start a draft for an AMIA panel.  I have started 
it, gotten it into the right format.  I have several questions

  1.  need to decide who will submit and who will lead each section of the 
panel.
  2.  This year, there can only be 3 presenters and 1 moderator, the intent is 
to truly get involvement from the audience.
  3.  Governance - I added information about how consumers are involved since 
it is a PCORI grant, however, this may need to be more governance issues that 
is broader.

What are the next steps on this?  I don't think I am the right person to do the 
panel, it seems it might be better to be people who are leads in some of the 
areas and one of the PI or co-PI as the moderator, someone who can manage time 
well and assure audience participaton.

Bonnie



Bonnie L. Westra, PhD, RN, FAAN, FACMI
Associate Professor, University of Minnesota,
School of Nursing & Institute for Health Informatics
Director, Center for Nursing Informatics
Location - WDH 6-155
P - 612-625-4470<tel:612-625-4470>, Fax - 612-625-7091<tel:612-625-7091>
email - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Mail - WDH 5-140, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455



On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Campbell, James R 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended 
only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure 
of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
please delete it and immediately contact the sender.


_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to