-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Gpc-dev] minutes gpc-dev 11 March 2014 for review
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:13:09 -0500
From: Umberto Tachinardi <[email protected]>
To: Thomas F Mish <[email protected]>, Wilson Nathan <[email protected]>
[...]
Stick to: +/- 30 days.
[...]
Umberto
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Gpc-dev] minutes gpc-dev 11 March 2014 for review
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:37:31 +0000
From: Phillip Reeder <[email protected]>
To: Thomas F Mish <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Tom/Umberto,
Regarding the +/-30 days, is there any documentation that states that
de-identifying dates with that offset is acceptable from a HIPAA
perspective? That is what I think we are looking for as 365 seems to be
the currently accepted standard for date shifting.
Phillip
On 3/11/14 1:54 PM, "Thomas F Mish"<[email protected]> wrote:
Sorry I couldn't make the phone call everyone. Two quick notes...
* When I talked with Umberto before heading down for the hackathon, he
reported the +/- 30 days was the standard.
* I think there are more than one Nathan's in the group, can we add a
last initial or a location to gain a bit more specificity when referring
to our plethora of Nathans? ;-)
-Tom Mish
On 3/11/2014 12:25 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
Nathan to see that Umberto solicits advice from the PCORNet privacy TF
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
________________________________
UT Southwestern Medical Center
The future of medicine, today.
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
