Not my intention.  I changed the slide on the patient_dimension base3d upon 
last week’s discussion assuming that all additional attributes other than core 
i2b2 features of patient_dim would be instantiated as Observation_facts and 
that metadata build for Demographics\ontology would  follow what KU has 
distributed.
As I recall we were not able to discuss provider  and visit dimensions last 
week and so I kept the PCORI attributes we have to support in the model for 
discussion which we can have tomorrow.  When we agree on the GPC standard 
reference then I will update the scripts for retrieval of PCORI CDM attributes 
that we will need to run to demonstrate harmonization with PCORI for July 1.
Jim

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: agreement on paths (c_fullname) is necessary and sufficient

This proposal, like the previous one, directly constrains the 
patient_dimension, provider_dimension, and visit_dimension.
 
Milestone_27_TestSQLv2.docx<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/attachment/ticket/114/Milestone_27_TestSQLv2.docx>​<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/raw-attachment/ticket/114/Milestone_27_TestSQLv2.docx>
 added

Those constraints conflict with practices and preferences at our site (and, as 
I recall, several others).

Plus, those constraints don't specify the concept paths (c_fullname in metadata 
tables) that would actually appear in the relevant queries.

Agreement on paths is necessary and sufficient for our work, as far as I can 
tell.

Given what I've seen so far, I disagree with any proposal that directly 
constrains the i2b2 table schema.

I tried to explain how paths are sufficient in last week's call, and I agreed 
to elaborate in detail. But as I mentioned, I'm at a conference this week, so 
I'm not sure I'll have it done in time for the May 6 call.


--
Dan


The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended 
only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure 
of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
please delete it and immediately contact the sender.
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to