Hi Michael,
Forwarding this thread to the GPC dev group; many of whom also provide BI 
services for various parts of their medical centers.

We’re building more reports out of R that are easy to use and very focused.  R 
itself is daunting to novices.  Vince on our team (Vince Leonardo) is probably 
the best person to do a taste test comparison of approaches.  So far Qlikview 
for university reporting has been reasonably responsive.  We probably will have 
some long term concerns with a large spaghetti code QVD qlikview object that 
makes maintenance potentially tricky.  QV also has a more complex licensing 
model(s) in that you can have seat, concurrent users, and document licenses.

At this point for the GPC, all the software is open source/free (i2b2, REDCap, 
R).  If we did need to provide a BI platform, we’d probably sort that out as a 
group and it would likely depend on where the data are hosted.

Russ


On Jul 21, 2014, at 11:08 AM, MICHAEL RANDALL 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Dear Russ:
Please forward as you suggest.  That will be a great start.
We are using i2b2 as well.  Do you find that R works well for you with regard 
to self-service BI tools such as dashboards and the like?
We have Oracle as well.  Are you pleased with its performance as well as 
QlickView’s (they are a candidate for this project)?
Do you have or are you aware of any of an OEM (per site) license for ClickView 
or other with sublicensing to members?  Do you handle all of the licensing for 
GPC and sublicense to your user members or other (maybe simpler with i2b2 and 
R)?
This is a fascinating subject and I really appreciate your input and your help 
with all of this.
Very best regards,
Mike

<image001.png>

Good Health Made PossibleTM

Michael Randall, Ph.D., MBA
Chief Economic Development Officer
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
864-608-1047

www.HealthSciencesSC.org<http://www.healthsciencessc.org/>

   
<image002.png><https://www.linkedin.com/company/health-sciences-south-carolina> 
        <image003.png><https://www.facebook.com/HealthSciencesSouthCarolina>    
     <image004.png><https://twitter.com/HSSCtweets>

From: Russ Waitman [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:27 AM
To: MICHAEL RANDALL
Subject: Re: Request

Hi Michael,
I am not sure about how easy it is to get the whole GPC’s input on a call but 
we’d love to help share approaches.  I think it’s fairly heterogeneous and 
depends a lot on how informatics is structured at each place.

Would you like me to share your request to the leaders at each site?  We could 
have people email back their approaches and then you might follow up with the 
ones you find most interesting.

Here at KUMC our team’s role is separate from the hospital but increasingly 
supporting it.  We use i2b2 plus R for general research needs and are now 
piloting its use for the health system’s population health needs.  On the KUMC 
institutional reporting side (finance, university functions) we stage data or 
have views other Oracle systems like PeopleSoft and then serve up the 
information using Qlikview.

For PCORI through the GPC, we will be using i2b2 at each site and proposed and 
will use R for preliminary analyses.  We’ll serve datasets to people as well in 
REDCap.  That’s how we do things at KUMC.

Since award from PCORI we’ve learned we also need to support the MiniSentinel 
data model so that will require transforming the data into that data model so 
it can have SAS based scripts run against it.  So, we need to be flexible.

Let me know

Russ

On Jul 21, 2014, at 8:30 AM, MICHAEL RANDALL 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Greetings Russ:
I hope that are doing well and that GPC is flourishing.

I have a favor to ask of you.  Health Sciences South Carolina (HSSC:  
http://healthsciencessc.org/), a statewide health research collaborative, is in 
the process of selecting a self-service BI/analytics toolset that we can offer 
to our membership in conjunction with our clinical data warehouse and research 
services.  We feel that this system will be very helpful to local and 
institutional quality improvement efforts and that it will help our members to 
better understand and benchmark their respective care capabilities.

In planning for this system, we have discussed licensing and sustainability 
models for incorporation of the new self-service BI/analytics tool into our 
system, as a tool for our members to use to benefit healthcare in South 
Carolina, and we thought that it would be a good idea to reach out to other 
multi-institution collaboratives like yours in order to understand how you 
offer analytics products to your members (sublicenses or other, as well as 
other important factors to consider, etc.?) as well as how your business models 
for sustainability of these types of systems are structured and work.

Would GPC be willing to share its experience and suggestions with regard to 
multi-institutional software selection, licensing and business model?  We would 
greatly appreciate the benefit of your experience.
Thank you so much in advance for your help and input.

Very best regards,
Michael



<image001.png>

Good Health Made PossibleTM

Michael Randall, Ph.D., MBA
Chief Economic Development Officer
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
864-608-1047

www.HealthSciencesSC.org<http://www.healthsciencessc.org/>

   
<image002.png><https://www.linkedin.com/company/health-sciences-south-carolina> 
        <image003.png><https://www.facebook.com/HealthSciencesSouthCarolina>    
     <image004.png><https://twitter.com/HSSCtweets>

_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to