Records of our May 13 call say "JC to get clarification from PCORI" about Enrollment.
Any news, Jim? -- Dan From: Phillip Reeder [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:44 AM To: Dan Connolly; Lindsay Cowell Cc: [email protected]; Dipti Ranganathan; Susan Morrison; Campbell, James R Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #144: ETL Annotated Data Dictionary form required by PCORI I think that the Enrollment Table is one of the biggest question marks in my mind. What do we plan on using for this table? PCORI is expecting a start date/end date for the enrollment of a patient in the dataset, so the two visits in 3 years definition doesn’t seem to applicable. I’m assuming our basis would be algorithmic, since we don’t have regional isolation and don’t have insurance enrollment data. What algorithm should we apply? How will we store this in i2b2? What is the current proposal for how the counts should be generated? Nathan just sent an email about materializing the PCORI CDM view of the data warehouse. Should we all plan to do this so that we will have a consistent process for generating the counts? Will we be populating the CDM with all patients, regardless of the two visits requirement? Historic data? Etc? Phillip From: Dan Connolly <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, August 17, 2014 at 1:15 AM To: Lindsay Cowell <[email protected]> Cc: Phillip Reeder <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Dipti Ranganathan <[email protected]>, Susan Morrison <[email protected]>, "Campbell, James R" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #144: ETL Annotated Data Dictionary form required by PCORI <!-- .EmailQuote {margin-left:1pt; padding-left:4pt; border-left:#800000 2px solid} --> Would you please point us to your earlier questions? Or give a couple examples? Let's try to get as much done between calls as we can. On Aug 16, 2014 3:53 PM, Lindsay Cowell <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Jim, The GPC team at UTSW met yesterday to work on completing the ETL Annotated Data Dictionary. We have many of the same questions now as we had when generating counts for the original count table. We would like to request a call during which we attempt to agree across the 10 sites on a standardized way to generate the counts (or as close as possible). Perhaps this can happen during the next two gpc-dev calls? Or perhaps we need a separate time. Thank you, Lindsay On 8/14/14, 10:17 PM, "Campbell, James R" <[email protected]> wrote: >Nathan >I think that I have responsibility for this deliverable and so you can >forward Wisconsin response as attachment to the ticket and I will monitor >and collate for the network response to PCORI. >Jim > >James R. Campbell MD >[email protected] >Office: 402-559-7505 >Secretary: 402-559-7299 >Pager: 402-888-1230 > >> On Aug 14, 2014, at 2:56 PM, "Wilson Nathan" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> Where or to whom should I send the Wisconsin data dictionary? >> >> Nathan Wilson >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of GPC Informatics >> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:17 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #144: ETL Annotated Data Dictionary form >>required by PCORI >> >> #144: ETL Annotated Data Dictionary form required by PCORI >> ---------------------------------+------------------------ >> Reporter: campbell | Owner: ngraham >> Type: task | Status: assigned >> Priority: major | Milestone: popmednet >> Component: data-stds | Resolution: >> Keywords: ETL Data Dictionary | Blocked By: 145, 146 >> Blocking: | >> ---------------------------------+------------------------ >> >> Comment (by ngraham): >> >> I worked on adding the [https://bitbucket.org/njgraham/pcori-annotated- >> data-dictionary/commits/eb6e04281dfd9fd92758da1d51c7baf1d38e8e2e >>diagnosis CDM view] but ran in to performance issues - see >>ticket:146#comment:5. I plan to spend a little time trying to tune the >>query. >> >> -- >> Ticket URL: >><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/144#comment:9> >> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> >> Greater Plains Network - Informatics >> _______________________________________________ >> Gpc-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev > >The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, >intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use >or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received >this e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the >sender. > >_______________________________________________ >Gpc-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
