>From our data loading perspective, when entering information from a medication 
>order / dispense, for example, if there is an associated encounter number we 
>include it, but with the date in the particular table extracted from.  So, 
>from the observation_fact perspective, there are going to be many more entries 
>in the query that includes the lag function than the one I ran back in 
>September.

We’re loading the visit_dimension based on the PAT_ENC table data alone and the 
encounter start/end dates there.

If the numbers from the two queries weren’t so far off, then I’d agree that 
this is only a semantic distinction.  Did anyone else have numberers that were 
way different or is this uncovering a difference in practice with our data 
loading steps?

- Glenn

   Medical Informatics Senior Analyst
   CTSI – Clinical & Translational Science Institute
   [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
   (414) 805-7239

From: <Campbell>, James R <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 at 9:23 PM
To: "<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, George Kowalski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Glenn Bushee 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #196: Should the "active patient" be based on 
visits or encounters?

>From the structure of our EHR and my understanding as clinician/informatician 
>I cannot help but ask what is the difference between a visit and and 
>encounter?  A visit with me
as pricare is an encounter and most face-to-face with clinicians are 
encounters.  What is the distinction we are seeking here?
Jim

James R. Campbell MD
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Office: 402-559-7505
Secretary: 402-559-7299
Pager: 402-888-1230

On Nov 18, 2014, at 5:21 PM, "GPC Informatics" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

#196: Should the "active patient" be based on visits or encounters?
--------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter:  mish          |       Owner:  mish
     Type:  problem       |      Status:  assigned
Priority:  minor         |   Milestone:
Component:  data-quality  |  Resolution:
Keywords:                |  Blocked By:
Blocking:                |
--------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by mish):

* priority:  major => minor
* status:  new => assigned


--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/196#comment:1>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics

The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended 
only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure 
of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
please delete it and immediately contact the sender.


_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to