#229: Enrollment terms based on Catchment Area, encounters, etc.
--------------------------+----------------------------
 Reporter:  dconnolly     |       Owner:  huhickman
     Type:  design-issue  |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  data-domains2
Component:  data-stds     |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:                |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:  67            |
--------------------------+----------------------------

Comment (by dconnolly):

 I suppose catchment area and within-50-miles should map to Geographic and
 the others are algorithmic.

 The mapping in our CDM ETL (#145) should answer this... but currently, the
 code seems to always set ENR_BASIS to 'A'.

 Ah... this is a known issue: [https://bitbucket.org/gpcnetwork/gpc-
 pcornet-cdm/issue/2/enrollment-mappings-missing gpc-pcornet-cdm/issue/2
 /enrollment-mappings-missing]. Nathan and I go back and forth about which
 issues to track where. My sense is that the bitbucket issues might be
 finer granularity than tickets here, but each major bitbucket issue should
 be represented by some open ticket here. So I guess I better make one
 up...

 ref [https://bitbucket.org/gpcnetwork/gpc-pcornet-
 
cdm/src/2b34bc7b71b13382b2cb697a10688fbc37f06c0d/CDM_transform_enrollment.sql?at=default#cl-20
 CDM_transform_enrollment.sql line 20]

--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/229#comment:10>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to