The part of the protocol that survived numerous rounds of revision and
reality checks against what happens when actually tried in REDCap is this:
Information about which of 24 sub-cohorts that patient is in, and what
site they're at, is encoded in the first five characters in the
`proj_id` field of the tracker. Then there is an underscore, and then
there is an 8-digit random number that is unique to the patient-set from
that site but not necessarily unique to the multi-site survey (not a
problem because 1, the prefix encodes the site, and 2, it will be
obvious which site a dataset is from because they will be uploaded
separately by each site).
On 05/26/2015 12:27 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
Angela,
In your demonstration, you said something about how a study ID column
conformed to the study protocol. I'd like today's meeting record to
include a pointer to that document. I don't see it from #249
<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/249>. Help me out?
--
Dan
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
